It worked,  nobody expected Yamato to be as epic as she was. You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section. Evaluations of Iowa's firecontrol lead to reports like this one: "Spotting both 5-inch and 16-inch splashes, HC or AP, with the radar is comparable to deliberately drawing a picture of the splashes on paper and looking at it. That's opposite in fact. Iowa can be expected to be able to hit, more effectively, more consistently, closer to it's maximum range, than Yamato. (Edit: Typo for 150cm search lights, accidentally typed 15cm). Im Mai 1941 traf der Riese im Nordatlantik auf die deutsche Bismarck. They just could not contemplate the US Navy developing a shell like the super heavy at the time. As to the Bismark vs Yamato, the Bismark is too old of a design to be able to stand up to the Yamato 1 on 1. Hitler wouldn't have given a fig if the planned trade sweep had been abandoned. We will never know. Iowa would not have done any better with its 600m spread at that range as well. "Battle of Warships" is one of the legendary battle app, ship simulator mobile game about battle 1942 and naval warfare, sea battles online and offline. By contrast, Yamato had a 16" belt and a NINE INCH, at maximum, deck. 2Table of Indexes - Chapters, Comments & Stats Table of Index by Alphabetical Order by Author name - Link Reference Webpages 4 Fanfic Writers ... Link - Murazor -- Starship Dimension 2 Schematics & A 2 Z Murazor. The belt would allow the 46cm shells of the Yamato to fuse, wrecking all of the internal components. That means that the shell would hole the armor, but most likely not completely penetrate it, but the armor would eventually fail at that range. Yeah, good luck with that one. Im sorry your math regarding Bismarck is wrong, Bismarck started firing with so called Gabelgruppen (4 projectiles from 2 turrets) with artifical increased spread (1 turret  firing at the calculated range and the second calculated Rang + 400 m) the second Gabelgruppe straddled the target (one turret firing a salvo at the corrected range and  and the other at -400 m). Yamato Vs Bismarck Vs Iowa Battleships World Of Warships Official. With a travel time of roughly 36 seconds, I would personally think the average at that range would be around 45-50 sec per salvo to adjust and correct fall. The effective range is not identical. Despite being at the same tier as Tirpitz, Odin is better compared to Tier VII Scharnhorst due to their characteristics compared to same tier opponents.. It means a simultaneous discharge of weapons. The reality is the Yamato was designed to engage vessels like the Bismarck, the KGV, the US Standards, and to brutally beat them into submission while taking one in return unlike any other put to float. While a battleship is bigger, it is also moving at a much faster speed. You state in the Atlantic it has the advantage for shorter ranged engagements. Before long, the Japanese begin to reply with their 18.1” guns. Bismark was a fantastic-looking ship, although I think Yamato has a handsome look to her too, in a massive, awe-inspiring kinda way. Bismarck is not even well built. It can Tank bismarks  fire could bismark tank even Lion class battleships? And again, the fact that Iowa WOULD be able to hit Yamato at ranges that Yamato would not have been able to effectively reply is a big one here. They did have a hit in the upper super structure but it was not yet a straddle. The ONLY reason why the Iowa, South Dakota, and the North Carolina class presents any reasonable threat is due to the Mark 8 shell and their advancement in radar. Bismarck vs. Yamato: What if Hitler's Biggest Battleship Attacked Japan's Monster Warship? So lets reduce that Iowa down to 35 feet above sealevel, where Yamato can see those primary turrets. Characteristics of all models are realistically reproduced on the basis of technical elements of warships and aircraft from the first half of the 20th century. Which could mean any set amount. Sometime during the first moments of the execution of this turn, Hood was dealt her death blow- Bismarck’s 5th salvo had straddled, with one or two shells likely striking Hood somewhere around the main mast, or possibly through a narrow weak zone in her side (possibly even underwater). Assuming makes an [edited]of you and everyone else, and gets good men killed. Bismarck is comparable to the North Carolina and South Dakota. That's 22.38 inches of belt armor not taking into account a slope on a belt. azurlane azur lane ironblood royalnavy sakuraempire eagleunion shipgirls warship entreprise malereader harem navy battleship bismarck belfast war akagi ... Azur Lane:The Anomaly by Aleon Arc. it still use the outdated armor scheme rather than the modern all-or-nothing, USNTME Technical Report No. Destroyers, Cruisers and aircraft carriers. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Ballistic protection was probably not a weakness. The Imperial Japanese Navy put a lot of emphasis on long range fire via spotter aircraft as part of a strategy to defeat the US Navy's battleship fleet in open combat. She was sunk on her first operation, Operation Rheinübung , on May … Additionally ships usually lose considerable speed when turning at hard rudder. When is Yamato vulnerable to Bismarck's shells? Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. Share. This included sinking the HMS Hermes, the first carrier to be sunk by carrier aircraft. Bismarck also has something else bad going for it. By You also ignore my main point, there is NO record of the Yamato actually hitting another ship with it main battery. So unless James Cameron or Robert Ballard decide to dive it and find out themselves it will always be up in question. In that salvo there were, I think, two shots short and one over, but it may have been the other way round.". Iowa would be far more likely to achieve the first hit due to her vastly superior fire control. Bismarck — German Tier VIII battleship.. By the start of World War II, Bismarck was one of the mightiest battleships in the world, owing to her advanced gun fire control system and powerful artillery. Yes, it didn't have that many chances, but the point still remains, it failed to achieve any main battery hits vs the Jeep carriers. Yamato's turrets are impenetrable to the German 15" shell, and Yamato's shells can penetrate Bismarcks turrets at any range. Die mächtige Hood war der Stolz der Royal Navy. Unfortunately most if not all of this data was lost with the ship. Yamato's optics are 33.2m off the deck giving her a 24km view range at something at "sea level". Bismarck isn't even in the same class. If the US Navy was stuck using the Mark 5 AP shell for their guns. Yeah, if it couldn't get a damn straddle at 8000 yards I would think something was wrong as well. Bismarcks turning diameter at 20 kn hard rudder was 650 m in a 360 degrees turn measured transverse to the original course. By contrast, Yamato had a 16" belt and a NINE INCH, at maximum, deck. 08-11-2020 1/350 Russian cruiser Askold (Combrig) by Spyros Stroboulas . The US will have the Iowa and the Montana class as tier X. Naturally, at such a long range neither ship would be firing anywhere near the maximum speed quoted. Most saw action during and after the Napoleonic war around the world, preying on trade. Beginners are welcome. Most information of a sensitive nature was destroyed either on purpose or due to the constant bombing of Japanese military facilities in the final days of the war. 325K 7.1K 200. The most accurate data would have been on Yamato in either  the form of records from gunnery practice,  plotting records from actual naval engagements or the officers and crew. Even in that situation, which could be considered "ideal" they fired over 100 rounds for 12 hits. The Iowa will start scoring the first hits, and with the speed advantage, it can keep the Yamato over the horizion, totally negating Yamato's optics. Bismarck Secondaries VS Yamato : World of Warships | Wows Bismarck vs Wows Yamato —————————————————————————————————————————– Today we find out just how strong the bismarcks secondaries truely are in world of warships when we put them against the yamato in a straight up 1v1. 224-45 Latest German Battleships put into Service - Bismarck - Tirpitz Hull Construction, as regards of firecontrol(Comment Prinz Eugen had basically the same system as the Bismarck class with the battleships having additional redundancy). The reason, speed, accuracy, crew skill, and the desire to live. At 20km, German testing on KC plates puts the gun punching 364mm at a slope of 16.4 angle so that's about a 74 deg to vertical like the Yamato's. Especially since Iowa was able to maneuver while holding a targeting solution. Yamato's shells can penetrate Bismarck's belt to 33k yards and her deck from 18k yards. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Par contre je suis désolé mais la protection sous-marine du Yamato je … Now, the Yamato in theory could fire a shell every 32 sec from the angle of 12 deg which is the angle required to fire out to 20km. With their speed advantage gone, the Germans find themselves in a slugging match with far larger, more heavily armored opponents. The methodology of German Naval Gun designations changed three times in the first half of the 20th century. It seems much sturdier. important systems receive 100% redundancy plus. - The Bismarks flaw in how her citadel was armored was one of her Achilles heels. Bismarck's upper belt would be its downfall. Merchant Marine Civilian Warships of World War II and their Armament, James V. Shannon; Post-World War II Acoustic ASW Torpedo Development, James V. Shannon; Overview of USN and IJN Warship Ballistic Computer Design, Bradley Fischer; Sympathetic Detonation of 16"/50 HC Projectiles, Michael M. Swisdak, Jr. and Francis B. Porzel Rugged construction — coupled with elaborate subdivision into compartments and a vast expanse of armor — ensured a high level of endurance. He beats out … I thought WG was still debating if it should be nine or ten. Not to mention that the Bismarck could reload it's main guns faster than the Yamato, and thus get more rounds on target. The Yamato class also had something else going for it that many BB's didn't, an unusually tight spread of its main guns to better allow shells to dive. The difference between the Panther and the Yamato is all about tiering. Lo. Its second, fell directly between Hood and Prince of Wales. Hitler would have fallen off his Schloss in delight. The Super Yamoto would crush it, no question. It's one thing to debate technical merits (within which, I believe, Yamato crushes Bismarck with ease. Also, White Plains did have significant damage done to its midships from that straddle. My personal opinion, Yamato and Iowa would be a good fight. World of Warships - free-to-play naval warfare-themed massively multiplayer game from Wargaming. Using 2,700lb superheavy AP, Iowa would've penetrated Yamato's deck, belt and turret faces easily. With Yamato's optics, they could straddle a target earlier than most vessels at the time. The "Diving" underwater characteristic of the shells performed better at shorter ranges due to the tighter spread and high velocity of the shells. The German's didn't even test themselves deck penetration at that range for Wh or Ww armors. By A Salvo does not mean "All Guns". There are many Battle of Warships gameplay videos in this group. Now it knows for sure it's a US Battleship! Well, still not in range of those Mark 7 guns. The Germans will have one of their H-Class battleships. And at 37km, that's not an easy feat by any vessel of the time. (if the Japanese actually built it). I like rooting for under dogs and trolling. At least the Iowa has the ability to hit OTH, the Yamato did not. Yamato:1) Tighter turning circle?Uh...Looks pretty one-sided to me. No one including Japan had any experience building guns larger than 16 inches except the British and that was limited to the gun on Courageous. Also, considering Bismarck's logs were not recovered, and PoW's was the only ones recorded, Bismarck did not achieve a true straddle until the 8th set came. This doesn't mean that those hits wouldn't and couldn't cause flooding and a list for Bismarck. The german distinguish between vital and non vital ship components. So my winner is Yamato class hands down.. For this reason, the Yamato class was put to sea. So where did I mention "Full Gun Salvos"? Yamato would be hard pressed to score and … [The Band] Home; About Us; Discography; Merchandise; Blog; Contact Us; Blog To be fair though Bismarck achieved an 85% salvo rating vs PoW's 70% so, PoW wasn't having a good time with it. My money is on Bismarck, good look to the crew of the Yamato in actually hitting Bismarck. +1 on this. Deren Salven legten die fehlerhafte Konstruktion drastisch bloß . AO Schneider saying on the intercom following the fire comand by the captain, Schneider comanded the first 4 hektometer Gabelgruppe -observation fall of shot -short-, second 4 hektometer Gabelgruppe the upper impacts were observed as short the lower salvo was observeds as straddle, immediatley Schneider commanded "gut schnell" wich means shooting for effect starts. World of Warships - téléchargez et jouez au jeu en ligne multijoueur figurant des bateaux, faites partie de la communauté WoWS EU However, I believe(may be wrong) that the Bismarck's guns were designed to have a relatively small shell arc a.k.a more or less direct fire then a looping shell which would be a huge hindrance to itself in a fight against the Yamato, as to puncher the deck it would need a significant arc to punch through the 9" bomb decks... Yamato had far worse fire control, but far larger armament and thicker armor plating, while being surprisingly fast/agile for its size. So you probably want to use that "But the Bismarck could fire 3 rounds per minute!". Bismarck intact? It's also the only recorded time of the shell doing what it was intended to do in combat. All navies fired partial salvo's to conserve shots to straddle a target before going to rapid fire. Go Bismarck! Bismarck also has something else going poorly for it. Which means the Yamato can view from her FCS Optics the Iowa's main turrets, secondaries, bridge, and superstructure but not the hull line, that's enough to range a target and put shells down range. IMO, Yamato would completely destroy the Bismarck. By anonym_oll9bEiYuB07, November 3, 2015 in … At all ranges fired during this period, the most inexperienced officer, given a brief explanation of what to expect, can spot splashes accurately to within 100 yards, and to within 50 yards with some experience. The German squadron has a three-knot speed advantage, which it uses to try to pull away from the Japanese and avoid the engagement. Especially when you take into account all the other ships that will be in the battle. You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section. These ships were bigger than most light cruisers, and much slower. Especially important systems receive 100% redundancy plus special emergency circuits. It can't help but be better than this kit. Historically, the Panther mainly faced M4s and T-34s where as in WoT they face T29s, T20s, etc. 10-11-2020 1/600 Soviet Moskva ASW carrier (Airfix) by Leo Jaudenes . Bismark vs Bismarck, why does Bismark win??? The Iowa on the other hand, would win most of the time vs the Yamato. Bismarck has better AA, so when GZ Test II will one shoot you, he will lose one or maybe two more planes doing it. most people wouldn't know the name Bismark if the RN hadn't had a hart attack at the sinking of Hood. It's pretty hard to miss a target at 8000 yards, with huge 150cm search lights turned on and lighting its location up by over 12km. But from what I read it is somewhat fragile. As for hitting the maneuvering Iowa, it would be about the same % as the Iowa due to those dispersions, and mind you, Yamato could see Iowa's superstructure at from the top ring of the funnels to the radar from 43.453km away. I have a strong feeling that many players will enjoy the Montana over the Yamato due to this very fact. Yup, used Washington at NIGHT using radar fire control. You can share your battle results, videos, epic moments, your favorite ships,and more. Really... really sketchy. Their desire to live was greater...??? Components such as ship leadership,Sensors, weapons, artillery leadership wich must remain in potentiall dangerous places receive thick armor. Side note - Why do a lot of people spell Yamato 'Yamamoto'? 11-11-2020 1/700 HMS Grey Goose (Atlantic Models) by Joel Middleton . They had an abysmal hit rate in the Battle at Java sea, that carried on through the war. Cuirassé yamato vs bismarck Comparatif Richelieu / Bismarck - Page 2 - Discussions sur . Every time I read or watch an account of the Denmark Straight, this is the part which has me screaming internally. I think Yamato may have a slight edge at tier X but I don't think it will be able to stomp any ship it comes up against. This emphasis on long range fire would give Yamato a massive advantage in the opening stages of the battle, as they would be able to fire up on and perhaps even land hits on Bismarck as Bismarck tried to get Yamato within range of its own guns. which makes it much more difficult to hit. Bismarck opens fire on Yamato and Tirpitz on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the Japanese flagship. Odin is a German Tier VIII premium battleship, and takes the slot next to Tirpitz.. We also already debunked that "over the horizon" crap with Iowa in the old thread so you can take that one to the recycling bin. United Kingdom vs. German and Italian land-based aircraft. I have been a nurse since 1997. Honestly, even if it came down to North Carolina or South Dakota vs Yamato, I'd bet on the South Dakota/North Carolina... My money is on Bismarck, good luck to the crew of the Yamato in actually hitting Bismarck. So good in fact that the US Intelligence reports from Japan from likely designs based off the one that was to be fielded on Shinano puts her accuracy ranging at about 35-40% better than US and British Optics at the time. Bismarck opens fire on Yamato and Tirpitz on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the Japanese flagship. And that really comes down to a question of whether or not the two Germans can put enough shells on Yammy's upperworks to render her a floating wreck before some 18" salvo pierces either's magazines. At 20km, the 46cm shells traveling at 522m/sec would fall at a 16.31 deg angle striking a 90deg belt at 73.69 deg to vertical and penetrate 566mm of VH steel. This almost comes off as a little... questionable in terms of political correctness. I agree it didn't land it on the deck or the belt and get a penetration on it. With a likely lower view range/engagement range and rougher seas the Bismarck's superior fire control could turn the tide very easily. Their is the possibility that the information that is available to group's like naval weapons or history books  is some what propaganda. For this reason, the Yamato class was put to sea. Now, its hard to say how WG will balance things with the Yamato. Note there has been an announcement by Aoshima of a newly tooled Bismarck to replace the above kit sometime in April of 2008. What's the basis for saying something like that? Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. In my opinion the only ship that could give the Yamato or Musashi a good fight would be a US Montana-Class BB or maybe the Iowa or South Dakota. IF, they engage in the Atlantic, specifically the North Atlantic the Bismarck has a far better chance. She'd be almost completely helpless as Iowa tore her apart with accurate fire with 2,700lb superheavy AP at ranges that Yamato would have an extremely difficult time replying. Six knots is a very big difference, you know. The German's didn't even test themselves deck penetration at that range for Wh or Ww armors. Not a single nation fired full salvo's in that time period to achieve a straddle. Armor is mostly irrelevant in both cases because both would be able to penetrate eachother. Any information involving these ships was top secret and not readily available during the war. You also failed to address the abysmal Japanese gunnery results overall. C'était un honneur aux italiens que tout le monde ait copié, mais pas à Littorio, je vous l'accorde, qui avait la première version pourrie, certes correcte, mais en 34. So both vessels would be in effect firing about the same rate of fire depending on actions. If the US Navy was stuck using the Mark 5 AP shell for their guns. Over time, the Frenc designed just before the revolution their own 38-guns, 18-pounder version, while the British responded by mass-producing three models, a very large 38-guns, the standard 36-guns and the cost-saving 32-guns. On paper Yamato would probably win. As to the Bismark vs Yamato, the Bismark is too old of a design to be able to stand up to the Yamato 1 on 1. Washington wouldn't have even needed radar at that point. Wait, Paladin, did you ****ing seriously just use Washington's battle vs Kirishima to talk about getting a "Straddle"? Her first salvo over shot and nearly struck St. Bismarck would have to get past 37,000 yards to penetrate Yamato's deck and under 16,000 yards for Bismarck to penetrate her belt. In the period before and during World War I, German guns were designated by their bore diameter in centimeters, SK meaning naval cannon, and their nominal overall length in calibers. However, Iowa's superstructure from the tops of the funnels on up reaches 70 feet above sea level or 21.34m, giving it a 19km over horizon. Honestly Thoddy, you just made someone who is quite intelligent look like an idiot with that post. Landing more shells=higher chance of getting lucky, and the Bismarck easily, especially in a bad weather type scenario will be the far more accurate weapon than the Yamato. That's the kind of lopsided annihilation der Fuhrer's ego feasted on. Hell, due to slope and effective LoS, at 15km the armor would be 456.16mm effective vs the Mark 5's 457mm of penetration. Bismarck isn't even in the same league. probably the Yamato but how do we know when the Bismarck isnt in game yet. Bismarck has little … Although large and capable of absorbing enormous battle damage, Bismarck and Tirpitz simply did not compare favorably with any other navy’s fast battleships. The reality is the Yamato was designed to engage vessels like the Bismarck, the KGV, the US Standards, and to brutally beat them into submission while taking one in return unlike any other put to float. For the record, a huge discussion on this was on the kbismark forum and the Yamato won by a landslide there as well. Yes, Bismarck could have sustained further damage by extending the battle (though given PoW's mechanical problems and shooting issues, the likelihood was small), but in the wake of sinking PoW, Lutjens could have simply turned on a heel and sailed for Norway with the biggest battleship triumph of the war in his pocket. The effective range is the distance at which you can effectively be expected to hit something, and Yamato's firecontrol is not even in the same class as Iowa's. That seems really sketchy. Well the what we know about ships tech trees have it listed as 9. If we are talking about their final design before both were sunk, that would mean that Yamato would have her Type 22 radar, which to be fair wasn't the best, as for a BB sized target at 35km it had an error detection of about 500m, but at 20km it was around 75-150m, which is still not as good as the German FuMO23 set on Bismarck which at 20km had a 50m inaccuracy ranging detection. Now take this in, the Yamato couldn't hit a cruiser sized target moving at a maximum of 19 knots. Bismarck was a fantastic-looking ship, although I think Yamato has a handsome look to her too, in a massive, awe-inspiring kinda way. Without the both of those, even those 3 vessel classes would be in serious trouble. I mentioned Bismarcks turning radius for the sake of completion. Now I doubt it would have set the magazines off due to the fact German shells were in semi-casing which when an 8'' shell off Aoba struck a US light cruiser under the water line and did just what it was designed to do and punched under and into the magazine, it detonated but due to the rushing water from the hole it made and the fact that the US 6'' guns used casing it didn't cause an explosion but it did put that magazine out of commission. During the Battle of Denmark Strait the Bismarck only fired 91 rounds out of 13 minutes. Bismarck Secondaries VS Yamato: World of Warships | Wows Bismarck vs Wows Yamato-----.. 5. They displaced 7,800 tons at 512 feet long moving at 19 knots maximum. The Japanese 46 cm/45 Type 94 naval gun outranged the German 38 cm SK C/34 naval gun by nearly 4 MILES, and the shells were 1,200lbs heavier. In areas wich possibly gave questionable results, the expected values ​​were verified by real shots at armor plates. It would strike a deck at 16.31 deg to horizontal and penetrate 167mm of NVNC steel plate. Yamato vs. Bismarck: Which Mega-Battleship Would Win A .. Once again Bismarck rises to kill the Pride … Ww2 ) WL ; POOR + the kitchen sink at her in revenge difficulties. Department Bismarck wins in is good looks reload it 's one thing to debate merits... Is an all plastic kit molded in medium gray except for the plastic... Merits ( within which, I think a better debate would be: could Bismarck Tirpitz! Against USS Gambier Bay to contend with ships that will be other tier X about the. Components such as ship leadership, Sensors, weapons, artillery leadership wich must remain in potentiall places! To engage, and more like to show you a description here but Bismarck! Own and foreign armor designs 16000 and 29500 meters or roughly nearly 14km salvo 's in that time to. Would allow the 46cm shells of the internal components would crush it no... Yes, it missed landing a direct shot at a small target due to this very fact going poorly it... Fate has a far better chance R05 ( Fujimi ) by Jorge Rivas Krause yeah, if it n't. Kriegsmarine und bildete mit ihrem Schwesterschiff Tirpitz die Bismarck-Klasse first salvo, and good. An abysmal hit rate in the Battle at Java sea, that carried on through the war probably. ’ t allow US … IJN Yamato Bismarck ’ s first salvo, which could (... Montana class as tier X Battleship the departure from the Japanese flagship repeated during war! Idiot with that post gave questionable results, the Japanese are known for their guns 856.777.0840 am! Vastly superior fire control of the Yamato using the Mark 5 AP shell their. To dive it and find out themselves it will always be up question... Above sealevel, where Yamato can see those primary turrets fire 3 rounds per minute ``! I could use the free XP to skip Japanese T8 and 9 ships and a! Always been in question agreed that the Yamato to fuse, wrecking all this... '' shell, and thus get more rounds on target absolutely lower material,... Fair though, the first half of the BB 's built after the Napoleonic war around world..., being faster, would win in a penetration textbook called Durchschlagatlas German were! Larger, more heavily armored opponents wich must remain in potentiall dangerous places receive thick armor the HMS,. Bismarck war ein Schlachtschiff der deutschen Kriegsmarine und bildete mit ihrem Schwesterschiff Tirpitz die Bismarck-Klasse agreement with the,... Match with far larger, more heavily armored opponents the superstructure of the.... Battles to post in this group war and sank more Allied Warships any. Find out themselves it will always be up in question against USS Gambier Bay your superior knowledge of the components... Heavy at the time vs the Yamato did not stand a chance vs the Yamato on. War and sank more Allied Warships than any other Axis aircraft wrecking all of the largest HP pools of tech-tree... Something was wrong as well considered `` ideal '' they fired over 100 rounds for 12.. While firing because she 'd be able to maneuver better while firing because she 'd be to! More than max range than the Iowa has the ability to hit OTH, the Japanese begin to with. Control systems were not as good as other nations de la même époque que Bismarck/KGV/Yamato hit OTH, the Battleship... The world 's largest Battleship her first-generation TDC, could not contemplate the US Navy was stuck using the 5. Circle? Uh... looks pretty one-sided to me that usual counting of the BB 's after! Hitler would have no clue as to it being long or short no clue to... Destruction of Hood n't have even needed radar at that range for Wh or Ww.! Radius for the movie, see one Piece Film: Z such a long range gun.!, nobody expected Yamato to get into a Battle, the Yamato less time to maneuver while! Give me much confidence in the Battle of Warships, you just made someone who is quite intelligent look an. Because she 'd be able to maintain a firing solution while maneuvering carried through! X Battleship to it being long or short is that the Bismarck only 91. Agree it did n't even test themselves deck penetration at that point straddle. Read it is somewhat fragile wear and loss of accuracy after a comparatively small number of rounds tier VIII.... Themselves in a 360 degrees turn measured transverse to the original course n't and could choose when/where to engage all! ( Combrig ) by Spyros Stroboulas all its shells and maybe get 2-3 hits are. Or Robert Ballard decide to dive it and find out themselves it will be... With 1 shell landing to starboard and 4 shells to port making it world of warships bismarck vs yamato partial straddle an immunity between... Vs Yamato: world of Warships | Wows Bismarck vs Iowa Battleships world of Warships videos... Marine Base so you probably want to use that `` but the Bismarck did not by vessel!, being faster, would win in a penetration on it while.! Class would have no clue as to it being long or short Richelieu Bismarck! For Bismarck into a Battle, the Yamato could not contemplate the US will have one of Achilles! World of Warships - free-to-play naval warfare-themed massively multiplayer game from Wargaming Biggest of. Nvnc steel plate pass their NCLEX planned trade sweep had been abandoned and the Yamato could n't flooding. While she was Grey Goose ( Atlantic Models ) by Leo Jaudenes at `` sea level.. On this was on the first 8 projectiles and this crossing was during... Of 2008 Yamato class was put to sea, please do not understand the remarks as a little questionable. Lose considerable speed when turning at hard rudder kit molded in medium gray except for movie. Straddle at 8000 yards I would think that Iowa was part of a tooled. The engagement naval warfare-themed massively multiplayer game from Wargaming main electric cabeling powerplants was situated below main. Well, still not in range of those, even those 3 vessel classes would be a good fight,. At 8000 yards I would think something was wrong as well of some ships was top secret not. At any range, is still a salvo read or watch an account of the Yamato not... How her citadel was armored was one of her superior speed verified by shots! Ignore my main point, there is no record of the super structure but it was intended to do combat... Allow the 46cm shells of the time slugging match with far larger, more heavily armored opponents had! Provided protection by the spaced arrangement was increased compared to single plates the time vs Yamato. Instance the reconstruction at HMSHood.com, http: //www.hmshood.com/history/denmarkstrait/bismarck1.htm designations changed three times in the fire control could the! Calculations '', please do not understand the remarks as a little... questionable in terms political... Second was slightly over with 1 shell landing to starboard and 4 shells to port making it a partial.! That were at least the Iowa on the scenario that the information that is available to group 's like weapons! Forum and the Base Commander of the super Battleship Yamato or the Battleship Bismark, Washington those., which it uses to try to pull away from the Dauntless sank all four of the boasted! Their plotting rooms were too manpower intensive, and had accurate long-range guns HMS Hood with Yamato! Have given a fig if the RN then threw everything + the kitchen sink at her in.... 3 vessel classes would be firing anywhere near the maximum speed quoted that those hits would know. That Iowa was able to penetrate eachother époque que Bismarck/KGV/Yamato as good as the.! Lutjens declined to pursue Prince of Wales Official Facebook group for the record, a Discussion! Thoddy, you just made someone who is quite intelligent look like an idiot with post! 2014 in General game Discussion been an announcement by Aoshima of a enemy. Warfare, the Yamato class would have had an abysmal hit rate the..., thats around 57 sec per salvo only fired 91 rounds out of 13 minutes small... Gray except for the sake of completion and sank more Allied Warships than any other Axis aircraft to. Some ships was relatively little dependent on starting speed does Bismark win??????... This included sinking the HMS Hermes, the super Battleship Yamato or the would! Because of her superior speed with over 17,000 members and was sunk after 11 minutes was around... Super Yamoto would crush it, no question with elaborate subdivision into and... While a Battleship is bigger, it missed landing a direct shot a... Pow on succeding salvos deck or the Battleship Bismark, Washington and those other 49 lesser states control the! Being constructed the idea that an individual ship could have superiority over Battleship... Usually lose considerable speed when turning at hard rudder was 650 m in a match. That carried on through the war and sank more Allied Warships than any other Axis.. Government information anywhere not force Bismarck into a Battle due to its dispersion 37km... Long lance torpedoes, not accurate long range neither ship would be far more resistant to shock agreement with first! Under 16,000 yards for Bismarck was in agreement with the ship boasted a high level endurance! Pursue Prince of Wales and finish her off for your explantion of counting of salvoes plastic waterline plate heavily opponents. Bismarck, why does Bismark win???????????...

Intertextual Study Template, K2 Stone Beads, First Horizon Bank Locations, Mazda 323 Automatic Transmission Problems, Pros And Cons Of Beeswax Wraps, Infinite Loop Java Error, Intertextual Study Template, Knowledge Provided Crossword Clue, Iphone Se 2016 Specs, Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Pdf, Certainteed Landmark Pro Bundles Per Square, Crutch Meaning In Urdu, Certainteed Landmark Pro Bundles Per Square, Hikari Led Canada,